city offer nasri 180k a week

tinpot lane · Post by **tinpot lane** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:16 pm

augie wrote:
Barriecuda wrote:I could understand United, definitely. Great team, many trophies, one of the best managers of all time. But Citeh? If he does go over to Eastlands it will be a move of pure greed, not one of football ambition (and don't even get me started with "oh but they're in the CL now!").

Let's also remember one thing. Nasri was a good player we plucked out of France for something like 9-12m. He has been a decent and consistent player but far off world-class, with the exception of 6 exciting months last season. Now he is trying to justify doubling his value and his wage. Has he improved 200% since he came from Ligue 1? I don't think so.

If City want to offer these extortionate, frankly ridiculous wages to even just "good" players, let them. They're in the CL now but two seasons have shown that their money-pumping mentality is only enough for a Europa spot and an FA Cup against Stoke. Arsenal can find better players for 20m than Nasri, I'd bet.

Seriously ?? Listen slate citeeh, their arab owners and their total disregard for financial prudence if you like but dont even bother with the "the players are only going there for the money" line cos we all know that is total bullshit. Like it or not citeeh have money and regardless of its source they are gonna use it to get the club up to where they want to go. They are showing huge ambition and players can also see that so why shouldnt they go there now they are in the champs league ? A few years ago people wanted to disregard their chavs and their new found "wealth" but they are still there competing for all the top prizes and citeeh will be the same so deal with that and I would suggest that any player signing for them is showing far more ambition than a player deciding to stay with our club

Over United?

Gunnersaurus · Post by **Gunnersaurus** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:17 pm

Like it or not but City are now at the level of United with regards to competing.

1989 · Post by **1989** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:27 pm

It's all Wenger's fault.

Gunnersaurus · Post by **Gunnersaurus** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:31 pm

Off course it is and tonight he will know it, players want medals or money, they don't want to be part of a never ending vanity project.

Post by **HashKads** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:32 pm

USMartin wrote:
kingjayson1 wrote:Chris, can you pass this message on please?

FUCK OFF NASRI YOU LITTLE CÃœNT PUSSY
Enough - that phrase is being patented and I will contact my team of barristers if you presist in using it , thank you very much

How about you get your arse into the basement you little *word censored* pussy?

tinpot lane · Post by **tinpot lane** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:37 pm

Gunnersaurus wrote:Like it or not but City are now at the level of United with regards to competing.

For the brainless ones?

Gunnersaurus · Post by **Gunnersaurus** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:45 pm

Not really mate, they have the resources to compete with the best now, we could be approaching their period of dominance, its been building.

tinpot lane · Post by **tinpot lane** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:59 pm

Gunnersaurus wrote:Not really mate, they have the resources to compete with the best now, we could be approaching their period of dominance, its been building.

And you base that on what? United have already made additions to a championship winning team, a manager who's won the lot and continues to do so, proven winners throughout their squad who have vast amounts of experience at the top level, the worlds biggest fanbase and resources that can compete financially with the best.

Whereas City have what?

frankbutcher · Post by **frankbutcher** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:08 pm

tinpot lane wrote:
Gunnersaurus wrote:Not really mate, they have the resources to compete with the best now, we could be approaching their period of dominance, its been building.
And you base that on what? United have already made additions to a championship winning team, a manager who's won the lot and continues to do so, proven winners throughout their squad who have vast amounts of experience at the top level, the worlds biggest fanbase and resources that can compete financially with the best.

Whereas City have what?

Tinpot - is that name not a tad ironic, considering Spurs have won a trophy more recently than us? Your user name is out-of-date, so please change it.

In regards to you - you're simply a Wenger apologist. You don't like the fact that the Wenger empire is falling down around his ears. The man is now raping the Club of all of its class and ideals. We are a laughing stock, a joke, a Club in decline. All of this is down to Wenger. One man's ego has destroyed a Club. The bond with the fans is gone. He will never be forgiven.

Gunnersaurus · Post by **Gunnersaurus** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:09 pm

tinpot lane wrote:
Gunnersaurus wrote:Not really mate, they have the resources to compete with the best now, we could be approaching their period of dominance, its been building.
And you base that on what? United have already made additions to a championship winning team, a manager who's won the lot and continues to do so, proven winners throughout their squad who have vast amounts of experience at the top level, the worlds biggest fanbase and resources that can compete financially with the best.

Whereas City have what?

Unlimited wealth in a game dominated by money.

I guess you were one of those that thought they couldn't spend their way into the CL.

franksav63 · Post by **franksav63** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:17 pm

frankbutcher wrote:
tinpot lane wrote:
Gunnersaurus wrote:Not really mate, they have the resources to compete with the best now, we could be approaching their period of dominance, its been building.
And you base that on what? United have already made additions to a championship winning team, a manager who's won the lot and continues to do so, proven winners throughout their squad who have vast amounts of experience at the top level, the worlds biggest fanbase and resources that can compete financially with the best.

Whereas City have what?
Tinpot - is that name not a tad ironic, considering Spurs have won a trophy more recently than us? Your user name is out-of-date, so please change it.

In regards to you - you're simply a Wenger apologist. You don't like the fact that the Wenger empire is falling down around his ears. The man is now raping the Club of all of its class and ideals. We are a laughing stock, a joke, a Club in decline. All of this is down to Wenger. One man's ego has destroyed a Club. The bond with the fans is gone. He will never be forgiven.

Tosspot would be a more relevant name...

woots82 · Post by **woots82** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:24 pm

Citeh had a target of a CL place & a domestic trophy - guess what? They got both.

I agree with previous posts, they are ambitious and will pay whatever it takes to get to the top...

frankbutcher · Post by **frankbutcher** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:31 pm

woots82 wrote:Citeh had a target of a CL place & a domestic trophy - guess what? They got both.

I agree with previous posts, they are ambitious and will pay whatever it takes to get to the top...

MONEY TALKS, BULLSHIT WALKS.

the playing mantis · Post by **the playing mantis** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:32 pm

tee cee the likes of piresistable still using the tired arguement of aw leaving would cause a mass exodus..brilliant imo.

also can someone direct me to the original thread where USM called someone (who was this) a little c*nt pussy??? also the one about all sorts of c*nts!

ta

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:50 pm

the playing mantis wrote:tee cee the likes of piresistable still using the tired arguement of aw leaving would cause a mass exodus..brilliant imo.

also can someone direct me to the original thread where USM called someone (who was this) a little c*nt pussy??? also the one about all sorts of c*nts!

ta

It was me he called a little *word censored* pussy.Tbh cant remember what the thread was about but he got upset with me over something i might have said