


P-R-E-C-I-S-E-L-Y.worthing_gooner wrote:What a load of horse shit. Same old crap year after year. When will someone be held accountable?
PHW is a complete fucking waste of space. If he had a decent bone in his body he'd step down after it was made perfectly clear that nobody wants him at the club anymore.
Stan's "speech" was of someone who actually doesn't give a toss about the football club, but only cares about his investment.
Wenger said trust the team and they're a good team and blah blah blah same thing we've heard for the last four years.
I totally agree they have too high an opinion of themselves; all these bridges and busts are a bit of a joke.Dan_85 wrote:Those boys on the board have a very high opinion of themselves. Made more off the back of the club than they ever put in.
Said it before and I will say it again: the Wenger-hole loving sheep are the biggest immpediment to success at this club.augie wrote:I Hate Hleb wrote:If, as it appears, Wenger has basically said the same sort of stuff that he has in previous years, why was he given a standing ovation by those in attendance?![]()
![]()
![]()
If kroenke and/or usmanov gets slated for buy shares as investors in our club then what is the difference between them and the other shareholders ?Some while back I asked what are the motives/priorities of all these small shareholders (is it profits or football) and I got slated for asking the question but you have to ask it again today if these people are giving wenger a standing ovation
As football fans surely you cant be anything but concerned about what is happening on the playing side of our club and if so, even if you dont hate wenger as much as me or baba or mikey etc, surely you dont give him such unconditional backing do you ?
Sometimes I really despair as much about the fools like this that give wenger such backing as I do when I look at wenger, the board and the team
I don't really have a problem with PHW, Kroenke and the rest making a profit, as I'd want to do the same if I'd made a significant investment.barnetgooner wrote:I totally agree they have too high an opinion of themselves; all these bridges and busts are a bit of a joke.Dan_85 wrote:Those boys on the board have a very high opinion of themselves. Made more off the back of the club than they ever put in.
However, those who made money from selling to Kroenke were shareholders, the club is financially in a far better state than when they bought their shares, so they're obviously going to make money from that. Right or wrong it's how the economy works...
Sooooo....Bring Back Pires wrote:It is.Rocky Number Seven wrote:Is it true they unveiled a bust of Ken Fryer at the AGM??
Not to mention the fact that they hold themselves up as models of virtue, the "custodians of Arsenal", yet can't sell their shares quick enough once a nice fat cheque from the yank is waved under their noses.Bring Back Pires wrote:I don't really have a problem with PHW, Kroenke and the rest making a profit, as I'd want to do the same if I'd made a significant investment.barnetgooner wrote:I totally agree they have too high an opinion of themselves; all these bridges and busts are a bit of a joke.Dan_85 wrote:Those boys on the board have a very high opinion of themselves. Made more off the back of the club than they ever put in.
However, those who made money from selling to Kroenke were shareholders, the club is financially in a far better state than when they bought their shares, so they're obviously going to make money from that. Right or wrong it's how the economy works...
However, what I do have a problem with is that they care 100% about the money, and 0% about the footballing side of things. If there was a little balance - even 30%/70% - then it'd be easier to swallow.
That's what she said.
True, tbh what I don't get is that surely having a successful team is the best way to make money?Bring Back Pires wrote: what I do have a problem with is that they care 100% about the money, and 0% about the footballing side of things. If there was a little balance - even 30%/70% - then it'd be easier to swallow.
That's what she said.
Yep, I also agree with your point about smaller/individual shareholders.augie wrote:Basically it is a self appreciation society![]()
![]()
SPOT ON!northbankbren wrote:Yep, I also agree with your point about smaller/individual shareholders.augie wrote:Basically it is a self appreciation society![]()
![]()
For me the AST are the most guilty of joining the love in. They are supposed to be a kind of voice for the fans yet I feel they are the opposite, and are very comfortable with their position within the club. A meeting with a rep from the club once every couple of months makes them feel as if they have some sort of power, yet in my opinion they have done nothing that really benifits the average fan.
They are the ones who should be making the noise, yet they seem happy to just feel as if they are part of the club, and seem reluctant to do anything that may harm this "relationship" they have. I mean a supporters group that charges to be a member for me speaks volumes.
Until the larger groups like the AST grow some balls and actually question the club, what hope do the smaller individual shareholders have of getting thier opinions heard.