Cahill to Chelsea

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
jrthgooner
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:24 am

Cahill to Chelsea

Post by jrthgooner »

I find it hard to understand why he is good enough for another top four side but is not someone we want to sign!!!

Having watched Mertersacker continually make mistakes (and show no sign of improving either) I would have jumped at the chance of improving our defence.

We are only one injury away from using the disaster that is Squillaci again

kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Post by kiwomya »

Why didn't Spurs sign him then? They were all over him in the summer and still didn't get him.

Chelsea are desperate because Alex will be leaving. They don't have much choice + he's going to be cheap by their standards.

User avatar
rodders999
Posts: 22627
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Diamond Club

Post by rodders999 »

I take it you haven't seen too much of Cahill's "defensive prowess" this season then? He has been toilet.

jrthgooner
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:24 am

Post by jrthgooner »

That was Bolton hanging on for more moeny, the same way they quoted us a huge price for him!!

He is an England international and now in a price bracket that our boss likes so why not move for him?

kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Post by kiwomya »

jrthgooner wrote:That was Bolton hanging on for more moeny, the same way they quoted us a huge price for him!!

He is an England international and now in a price bracket that our boss likes so why not move for him?
Wenger bought Mertesacker and has played him practically every game since he signed. You reckon he's going to just drop him and sign Gary Cahill? Mertesacker hasn't even had a steady partnership since he signed.

Gary Cahill, like all the other summer "targets" the media associated us with has been shite this season. Chris Samba, Roger Johnson and Scott Dann also get a mention!

SouthCoastArsenal
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:56 am
Location: Bournemouth

Post by SouthCoastArsenal »

Alex is leaving

Wow, a bit part player not good enough for our rivals.

Wenger, get that pen out.....

jrthgooner
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:24 am

Post by jrthgooner »

A mnagers job is to try and win trophies and have the best team around, something Arsene seems to have forgotten over the last few years!!

Is Cahill not better than Mertersacker? Djourou? Squillaci? If better players become availab le then we should sign them its as simple as that

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Post by SteveO 35 »

SouthCoastArsenal wrote:Alex is leaving

Wow, a bit part player not good enough for our rivals.

Wenger, get that pen out.....
They'll be the bait for a Van Persie deal in the Summer. Something like Alex and Kalou plus £5m for one of the top five strikers in Europe - another well negotiated deal.

Almost as good as selling one of Europe's finest left backs for Gallas + £5m.....all for the sake of £5k per week in wages.

I do love a 'sustainable model' - just the thing to get fans on the edge of their seats

User avatar
Bradywasking
Posts: 6219
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 am

Post by Bradywasking »

SouthCoastArsenal wrote:Alex is leaving

Wow, a bit part player not good enough for our rivals.

Wenger, get that pen out.....
The situation with Alex seems to be as much about his relationship with AVB as it is about his ability.....Luis has been muck this season and I reckon Alex would be better than him for Chelsea. Cahill is not showing leadership or experience with Bolton and their position doesn't lie...Mertesacker didn't deal with a nothing ball which lead to the corner which lead to Wolves' goal on Tuesday...They are all pretty much the same.

User avatar
swimmer1
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:19 pm
Location: 4th Place rat race

Post by swimmer1 »

Cahill to Chelsea they can have him

Mata tranfer to Chelsea big mistake by us not getting him .

kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Post by kiwomya »

jrthgooner wrote:A mnagers job is to try and win trophies and have the best team around, something Arsene seems to have forgotten over the last few years!!

Is Cahill not better than Mertersacker? Djourou? Squillaci? If better players become availab le then we should sign them its as simple as that
Gary Cahill isn't going to come to Arsenal and be backup is he? We bought Mertesacker just 6 months ago and Gary Cahill has done nothing this season to suggest he's a better player in any way.

SouthCoastArsenal
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:56 am
Location: Bournemouth

Post by SouthCoastArsenal »

Wengers defensive nouse is legendary

Hangeland & Cahill nearly came & they are absolutely toss

User avatar
brazilianGOONER
Posts: 9208
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
Location: i think we're parked, man
Contact:

Post by brazilianGOONER »

cahill is shit.

bullet dodged, i'm happy.

User avatar
Gunnersaurus
Posts: 4151
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:06 am
Location: london

Post by Gunnersaurus »

Poor Bolton, wanted 17, got 7, after this seasons showing they are lucky they got that.

Wenger don't get a lot right in the market but this time he did, Koscienly looks twice the player and that's who he would have been coming to replace, Mertersacker will prove a better addition for us then Cahill will for them.

Koscienly took time to settle, I ain't writing Mertersacker off yet and thought he did well against Wolves.

Offside
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Belfast

Post by Offside »

Oh no! Cahill to Chelsea. Who will save Arsenal's defence now? :roll:

Post Reply