Peter Cunt-Wood: Who needs CL footy

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Red Member
Posts: 1898
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:14 am
Location: London

Post by Red Member »

so the question is how to get Usmanov above 30%

who owns the remaining shares - supporters? surely it is in the interests of the club to sell to Usmanov...

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62322
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

Red Member wrote:DB10 Gooner

I agree with you that Wenger should have realised by now that Chamakh is shit. He is certainly not perfect, that is why I am not an AKB.

However all the best managers need help sometimes and the Arsenal board don't seem to have a clue what is going on most of the time
Can you not accept that the inability of Wenger to see that Chamakh is not good enough is Wenger's failing? The same way it was Wenger's failing that he took so long to see that Denilson and Eboue were shit? And he still cannot see that Vela, Bendtner and Diaby are shit.

Also, it's not the board's job to tell the team manager what players are good enough or too shit to keep. That kind of input usually leads to a manager resigning. The board manage the club's business and finances. The manager mages the team and players.

Our poor squad is down to one man; Wenger. He decides who we sign and he okays the rediculous pay rises and contract extensions for shit players like Eboue and Denilson and Diaby and Vela etc etc. If he thinks we don't have enough money for better signings then he should offload the expensive shit (NOT extend their contracts) and put THAT money towards better players.

Wenger built this squad and pays them a fortune in wages.

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Post by 1989 »

Red Member wrote:so the question is how to get Usmanov above 30%

who owns the remaining shares - supporters? surely it is in the interests of the club to sell to Usmanov...
Why would they sell to Usmanov? He'll actually spend money which is a frightening prospect for the board. :shock:

Remember the rights issue Usmanov proposed in 2009 which was rejected almost instantly?

They weren't keen on Kroenke initially, "we don't want his sort" they claimed. But when he assured them that he's only here for the profits and won't put fuck all back in they welcomed him on board. :shock:

Are they all closet **** trying to run the club into the ground?! Fuck knows. :?

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

DB10GOONER wrote:
Red Member wrote:DB10 Gooner

I agree with you that Wenger should have realised by now that Chamakh is shit. He is certainly not perfect, that is why I am not an AKB.

However all the best managers need help sometimes and the Arsenal board don't seem to have a clue what is going on most of the time
Can you not accept that the inability of Wenger to see that Chamakh is not good enough is Wenger's failing? The same way it was Wenger's failing that he took so long to see that Denilson and Eboue were shit? And he still cannot see that Vela, Bendtner and Diaby are shit.

Also, it's not the board's job to tell the team manager what players are good enough or too shit to keep. That kind of input usually leads to a manager resigning. The board manage the club's business and finances. The manager mages the team and players.

Our poor squad is down to one man; Wenger. He decides who we sign and he okays the rediculous pay rises and contract extensions for shit players like Eboue and Denilson and Diaby and Vela etc etc. If he thinks we don't have enough money for better signings then he should offload the expensive shit (NOT extend their contracts) and put THAT money towards better players.

Wenger built this squad and pays them a fortune in wages.
Well fucking said :high5:

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 10096
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Post by TeeCee »

Can you not accept that the inability of Wenger to see that Chamakh is not good enough is Wenger's failing? The same way it was Wenger's failing that he took so long to see that Denilson and Eboue were shit? And he still cannot see that Vela, Bendtner and Diaby are shit.

Also, it's not the board's job to tell the team manager what players are good enough or too shit to keep. That kind of input usually leads to a manager resigning. The board manage the club's business and finances. The manager mages the team and players.

Our poor squad is down to one man; Wenger. He decides who we sign and he okays the rediculous pay rises and contract extensions for shit players like Eboue and Denilson and Diaby and Vela etc etc. If he thinks we don't have enough money for better signings then he should offload the expensive shit (NOT extend their contracts) and put THAT money towards better players.

Wenger built this squad and pays them a fortune in wages.

Spot on mate (who did you get to write that for you)? :wink: :lol:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62322
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

TeeCee wrote:
Can you not accept that the inability of Wenger to see that Chamakh is not good enough is Wenger's failing? The same way it was Wenger's failing that he took so long to see that Denilson and Eboue were shit? And he still cannot see that Vela, Bendtner and Diaby are shit.

Also, it's not the board's job to tell the team manager what players are good enough or too shit to keep. That kind of input usually leads to a manager resigning. The board manage the club's business and finances. The manager mages the team and players.

Our poor squad is down to one man; Wenger. He decides who we sign and he okays the rediculous pay rises and contract extensions for shit players like Eboue and Denilson and Diaby and Vela etc etc. If he thinks we don't have enough money for better signings then he should offload the expensive shit (NOT extend their contracts) and put THAT money towards better players.

Wenger built this squad and pays them a fortune in wages.

Spot on mate (who did you get to write that for you)? :wink: :lol:
:lol:


But yeah, it was a mate in work... :D :wink:

User avatar
Percy Dalton
Posts: 6060
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Selling peanuts on the North Bank
Contact:

Post by Percy Dalton »

Like you have a mate!

:lol: :lol:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62322
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

Percy Dalton wrote:Like you have a mate!

:lol: :lol:
:(

Okay, so I paid this random crunt in work! :lol: :wink:

User avatar
Percy Dalton
Posts: 6060
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Selling peanuts on the North Bank
Contact:

Post by Percy Dalton »

DB10GOONER wrote:
Percy Dalton wrote:Like you have a mate!

:lol: :lol:
:(

Okay, so I paid this random crunt in work! :lol: :wink:

Well you have always had to pay for sex so I guess that was no big deal!

:lol: :wink:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62322
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

Percy Dalton wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
Percy Dalton wrote:Like you have a mate!

:lol: :lol:
:(

Okay, so I paid this random crunt in work! :lol: :wink:

Well you have always had to pay for sex so I guess that was no big deal!

:lol: :wink:
Well you were the cheapest option that night. :lol:

User avatar
Percy Dalton
Posts: 6060
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Selling peanuts on the North Bank
Contact:

Post by Percy Dalton »

DB10GOONER wrote:
Percy Dalton wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
Percy Dalton wrote:Like you have a mate!

:lol: :lol:
:(

Okay, so I paid this random crunt in work! :lol: :wink:

Well you have always had to pay for sex so I guess that was no big deal!

:lol: :wink:
Well you were the cheapest option that night. :lol:

My prices work on a size ratio!

:lol:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62322
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

Percy Dalton wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
Percy Dalton wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
Percy Dalton wrote:Like you have a mate!

:lol: :lol:
:(

Okay, so I paid this random crunt in work! :lol: :wink:

Well you have always had to pay for sex so I guess that was no big deal!

:lol: :wink:
Well you were the cheapest option that night. :lol:

My prices work on a size ratio!

:lol:
Hang on - I want a refund then!! Your cock was tiny! And your arse was fucking massive!! At one stage I had an arm and a leg in there. That was when a couple of those Chilian miners popped up!! :evil:

:wink:

User avatar
brazilianGOONER
Posts: 9208
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
Location: i think we're parked, man
Contact:

Post by brazilianGOONER »

:lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
littlefire
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:48 am
Location: Another Grove

Post by littlefire »

Fcuk Goetze let's sign a fcukin Exorcist...


:evil:

Post Reply