McDowell its over dude...no more - Hallelujah

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Locked
LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by LDB »

Chippy wrote:
the playing mantis wrote:why do we have to balance the books? our so called exwmplerary model of self sustaining is shit.

we have to sell players to make it work. what other supposed top or challenging top club has to do that? not even sperz.

the question is why, where is all this money going, in days passed we had a transfer kitty of decent size, the glory years bergy, henry viera etc at highbury for example, where we didnt have to sell in order to balance spending.

is this money going on debt repayments,as i thought that had been sorted by having ringfenced cash in the bank already in order to meet future obligations?

where is this money going? (its not wages as our wages are about what we should be spending for a club of our supposed size, even though we certainly dont get value out of the wage spend and its allocated ridiculously)
For the gazillionth time it is sat in the bank. You can see it on Pravda.

Look at p12 of the pdf, page 27 of the report itself

http://www.arsenal.com/assets/_files/do ... L.sw29.pdf
There is no page 12 on the pdf? Or am I being dense?

User avatar
the playing mantis
Posts: 4819
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: EX

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by the playing mantis »

well done chippy, as ever ignore half what i write and jump down my throat. im suggesting without the player trading where the hell is the rest of the cash going. we only have cash in the bank cos of selling our best players. we never used to rely on that so much, so i repeat where is the rest of this income going? if we have a barren period with no saleable assets, our financila model is f00ked and so are we.

User avatar
LeGinge (Northern Branch)
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:39 pm
Location: Blackheath

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by LeGinge (Northern Branch) »

the playing mantis wrote:well done chippy, as ever ignore half what i write and jump down my throat. im suggesting without the player trading where the hell is the rest of the cash going. we only have cash in the bank cos of selling our best players. we never used to rely on that so much, so i repeat where is the rest of this income going? if we have a barren period with no saleable assets, our financila model is f00ked and so are we.

It's going on Wages.

Without player trading our model is making £4m-£5m a year based on current expenditure. Cut the wage bill of two players earning £50k per week we get around £5.5m additional bottom line.

Essentially we are currently in a position where we need to trim the squad in order to buy AND make a profit within that financial year.

Our current board are all about increasing the value of their shares and this is done by guranteeing revenue streams and increasing current assets (i.e Cash) Ask yourself this - is Kroenke going to want Wenger to spend more than we earn in a year and potentially reduce the clubs value?

User avatar
the playing mantis
Posts: 4819
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: EX

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by the playing mantis »

thank u leginge. the problem is though our wages are not excessive for a club of our supposed size and the company we want to keep. sure its completely misallocated and wasted on certain players, but its level is around what it should be if we are really competing for th PL and CL. so how is this ever going to improve...will we always rely on player sales. i thought the move was to allow us to compete...waht lies. sure sponsorhip deals are undervalued but thats not going to make a massive diff when they are renegotiated.

our model is crap.

User avatar
LeGinge (Northern Branch)
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:39 pm
Location: Blackheath

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by LeGinge (Northern Branch) »

the playing mantis wrote:thank u leginge. the problem is though our wages are not excessive for a club of our supposed size and the company we want to keep. sure its completely misallocated and wasted on certain players, but its level is around what it should be if we are really competing for th PL and CL. so how is this ever going to improve...will we always rely on player sales. i thought the move was to allow us to compete...waht lies. sure sponsorhip deals are undervalued but thats not going to make a massive diff when they are renegotiated.

our model is crap.
True - but you also need to take in sponsorship. Currently Liverpool get £20m per year for their kit sponsorship - we get £5m per year.

Assume we can get another £15m per year and reduce the £5m or so finance payments we suddenly are making £25m per year (including the current £5m net profit)

This could pay for an additional £15m player and £75k wages. So theoretically a fully functioning sponsorship revenue stream will lead to an increase in the models profits.

Essentially it's all jam tomorrow which we have been fed for 6 years now. Moving was not really about competing. It was about securing the Arsenal name as a global brand, increasing value and making people rich. So far they have succeded.

I like to think of it in terms of the Republic building the second Death Star. It took years to build and probably cost a fair bit (Although I think the Storm Troopers earned a lot less than Denilson and Bendtner) but the ultimate goal was domination. Look how well that turned out... :D

User avatar
SammyDroppedHisShorts
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: In front of the best fans on earth. The Arse and all.

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by SammyDroppedHisShorts »

Why not take a punt on this fella.....after all he spends as much time on the treatment table as anyone else

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19195276

clockender1
Posts: 6257
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by clockender1 »

spanish papers reporting song has agreed terms with Barca and The Arsenal have agreed cash plus 20 yr old striker Cristian Tello.

interesting if true.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by northbank123 »

clockender1 wrote:spanish papers reporting song has agreed terms with Barca and The Arsenal have agreed cash plus 20 yr old striker Cristian Tello.

interesting if true.
Would be, but aren't Spanish papers even more notorious than their English counterparts for printing utter bollocks?

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30983
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by augie »

northbank123 wrote:
clockender1 wrote:spanish papers reporting song has agreed terms with Barca and The Arsenal have agreed cash plus 20 yr old striker Cristian Tello.

interesting if true.
Would be, but aren't Spanish papers even more notorious than their English counterparts for printing utter bollocks?



And both of them aren't even in McDowell's league when it comes to printing utter bollox :wink: :lol: :lol:

mcdowell42
Posts: 18396
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by mcdowell42 »

augie wrote:
northbank123 wrote:
clockender1 wrote:spanish papers reporting song has agreed terms with Barca and The Arsenal have agreed cash plus 20 yr old striker Cristian Tello.

interesting if true.
Would be, but aren't Spanish papers even more notorious than their English counterparts for printing utter bollocks?



And both of them aren't even in McDowell's league when it comes to printing utter bollox :wink: :lol: :lol:

Hows that arm of yours hope its not painful 8)

User avatar
Arsenal Till I Die
Posts: 5427
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:06 pm
Location: North London

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by Arsenal Till I Die »

clockender1 wrote:spanish papers reporting song has agreed terms with Barca and The Arsenal have agreed cash plus 20 yr old striker Cristian Tello.

interesting if true.
Tello is a very good young striker from what I've seen of him.

clockender1
Posts: 6257
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by clockender1 »

Arsenal Till I Die wrote:
clockender1 wrote:spanish papers reporting song has agreed terms with Barca and The Arsenal have agreed cash plus 20 yr old striker Cristian Tello.

interesting if true.
Tello is a very good young striker from what I've seen of him.
7 goals in 22 games - mostly cup and Cl, but still he's 20.

Rohan
Posts: 315
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:53 pm

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by Rohan »

It is even on their website. Fungus is a classless for some one achieved so much.
http://www.manutd.com/en/Tour2012Teaser ... oura.aspx#

User avatar
Arsenal Till I Die
Posts: 5427
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:06 pm
Location: North London

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by Arsenal Till I Die »

clockender1 wrote:
Arsenal Till I Die wrote:
clockender1 wrote:spanish papers reporting song has agreed terms with Barca and The Arsenal have agreed cash plus 20 yr old striker Cristian Tello.

interesting if true.
Tello is a very good young striker from what I've seen of him.
7 goals in 22 games - mostly cup and Cl, but still he's 20.
Thing is, I think getting Tello would be a steal. he does have the ability to be a good winger/striker.

User avatar
brazilianGOONER
Posts: 9208
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
Location: i think we're parked, man
Contact:

Re: McDowell's mainly made up Transfer Rumours Thread

Post by brazilianGOONER »

LeGinge (Northern Branch) wrote:
the playing mantis wrote:thank u leginge. the problem is though our wages are not excessive for a club of our supposed size and the company we want to keep. sure its completely misallocated and wasted on certain players, but its level is around what it should be if we are really competing for th PL and CL. so how is this ever going to improve...will we always rely on player sales. i thought the move was to allow us to compete...waht lies. sure sponsorhip deals are undervalued but thats not going to make a massive diff when they are renegotiated.

our model is crap.
True - but you also need to take in sponsorship. Currently Liverpool get £20m per year for their kit sponsorship - we get £5m per year.

Assume we can get another £15m per year and reduce the £5m or so finance payments we suddenly are making £25m per year (including the current £5m net profit)

This could pay for an additional £15m player and £75k wages. So theoretically a fully functioning sponsorship revenue stream will lead to an increase in the models profits.

Essentially it's all jam tomorrow which we have been fed for 6 years now. Moving was not really about competing. It was about securing the Arsenal name as a global brand, increasing value and making people rich. So far they have succeded.

I like to think of it in terms of the Republic building the second Death Star. It took years to build and probably cost a fair bit (Although I think the Storm Troopers earned a lot less than Denilson and Bendtner) but the ultimate goal was domination. Look how well that turned out... :D
finally an excellent post in this thread. the end is high class :lol: :barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

Locked