MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
Is there anyone who would want MK Dons to win today?
Damn they've just scored, cracking goal too!
Damn they've just scored, cracking goal too!
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
Equaliser and the fans went mental




Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
gotta be gutted if ur an afc wimbledon fan with tht
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
gutted for the real dons 

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
And while even mk dons fans can see what was wrong with the move it is undisputed that wimbledon's support was shite - and that's why they were ripe for exploiting. Don't know where the fuck all these afc wimbledon fans have come from & where they were hiding 15 years ago......
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
It's ok, we got it





Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
Good. You can impress your schoolmates with it in the morning.....kite wrote:It's ok, we got it![]()
![]()
![]()



Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
Good. You can impress your schoolmates with it in the morning.....kite wrote:It's ok, we got it![]()
![]()
![]()



- Perryashburtongroves
- Posts: 16114
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:18 pm
- Location: At the start of a glorious era.
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
To be fair, AFC Wimbledon have shown that it is possible to start from scratch and get a team into the football league inside a decade. Perhaps ****** Keynes could have tried that if they were that keen on having a professional team.MK Gould wrote:Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
And while even mk dons fans can see what was wrong with the move it is undisputed that wimbledon's support was shite - and that's why they were ripe for exploiting. Don't know where the fuck all these afc wimbledon fans have come from & where they were hiding 15 years ago......
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
They sure have. And rushden did much the same thing before them. But then you look how difficult luton are finding it to get back in the league once they were out. Pete winkleman was investing so much money that he wanted more of a guaranteed return. Investing big sums in Newport town or wolverton would have been very high risk. And mk didn't have an obvious, successful, non-league team to do it with.... Would definitely have been better than effectively buying someone else's franchise though.... Mind you, a mate of mine is a season ticket holder there & there are several "original" wimbledon fans who sit near him & travel up from London each week.... I'm sure they prefer playing in a fantastic stadium in mk than going bust, which is the way they were heading at the time of the move!Perryashburtongroves wrote: To be fair, AFC Wimbledon have shown that it is possible to start from scratch and get a team into the football league inside a decade. Perhaps ****** Keynes could have tried that if they were that keen on having a professional team.
-
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:24 pm
- Location: Gooner Valley N719 EIE
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
United moved across from one side of Manchester to the other a few years before we did, City done theMK Gould wrote:Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
.
same in '23 & again a few seasons back so why not call them "franchise" clubs as well as Chelsea who in 1905 were voted into the Football League BEFORE they played a game after Fulham declined a move to Stamford Bridge which is by Fulham Broadway!!!!
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
Fair point. Guess it depends how easy it would have been for the fans to follow. Maine road to city of Manchester stadium in today's world was ok. But my guess is that woolwich to highbury for a working man in the early 1900's would have been no easy journey.Almunia is a clown wrote:United moved across from one side of Manchester to the other a few years before we did, City done theMK Gould wrote:Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
.
same in '23 & again a few seasons back so why not call them "franchise" clubs as well as Chelsea who in 1905 were voted into the Football League BEFORE they played a game after Fulham declined a move to Stamford Bridge which is by Fulham Broadway!!!!
-
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:24 pm
- Location: Gooner Valley N719 EIE
Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon
Plenty of Sarf London Gooners still making the journey today so can't have been that hard
Trip into central London & a tube to Gillespie Road Underground. Same type of journey for United Fans from north west to south east through the centre of the city
Both clubs moved just far enough to keep their original core support, & then gain across their relative cities an increase in their gates & catchment areas.
Bit of a difference between "Franchise FC" & City, United, & Arsenal.
Chavski FC are a different case & much closer to the idea of a Franchise, voted into the league without
having been in the Southern or any other league beforehand


Trip into central London & a tube to Gillespie Road Underground. Same type of journey for United Fans from north west to south east through the centre of the city
Both clubs moved just far enough to keep their original core support, & then gain across their relative cities an increase in their gates & catchment areas.

Bit of a difference between "Franchise FC" & City, United, & Arsenal.
Chavski FC are a different case & much closer to the idea of a Franchise, voted into the league without
having been in the Southern or any other league beforehand

