MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
gavbacon
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:10 pm

MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by gavbacon »

Is there anyone who would want MK Dons to win today?

Damn they've just scored, cracking goal too!

Wengerball
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:41 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by Wengerball »

Equaliser and the fans went mental :barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

User avatar
DB10_TH14
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:52 am

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by DB10_TH14 »

gotta be gutted if ur an afc wimbledon fan with tht

User avatar
REB
Posts: 23439
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:40 pm
Location: meh

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by REB »

gutted for the real dons :(

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22160
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by SteveO 35 »

In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by MK Gould »

SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....

And while even mk dons fans can see what was wrong with the move it is undisputed that wimbledon's support was shite - and that's why they were ripe for exploiting. Don't know where the fuck all these afc wimbledon fans have come from & where they were hiding 15 years ago......

User avatar
kite
Posts: 699
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:28 pm
Location: Munich/Amsterdam

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by kite »

It's ok, we got it :wink: :rubchin: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by MK Gould »

kite wrote:It's ok, we got it :wink: :rubchin: :lol: :lol:
Good. You can impress your schoolmates with it in the morning..... :wink: :rubchin: :D !

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by MK Gould »

kite wrote:It's ok, we got it :wink: :rubchin: :lol: :lol:
Good. You can impress your schoolmates with it in the morning..... :wink: :rubchin: :D !

User avatar
Perryashburtongroves
Posts: 16113
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: At the start of a glorious era.

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by Perryashburtongroves »

MK Gould wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....

And while even mk dons fans can see what was wrong with the move it is undisputed that wimbledon's support was shite - and that's why they were ripe for exploiting. Don't know where the fuck all these afc wimbledon fans have come from & where they were hiding 15 years ago......
To be fair, AFC Wimbledon have shown that it is possible to start from scratch and get a team into the football league inside a decade. Perhaps ****** Keynes could have tried that if they were that keen on having a professional team.

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by MK Gould »

Perryashburtongroves wrote: To be fair, AFC Wimbledon have shown that it is possible to start from scratch and get a team into the football league inside a decade. Perhaps ****** Keynes could have tried that if they were that keen on having a professional team.
They sure have. And rushden did much the same thing before them. But then you look how difficult luton are finding it to get back in the league once they were out. Pete winkleman was investing so much money that he wanted more of a guaranteed return. Investing big sums in Newport town or wolverton would have been very high risk. And mk didn't have an obvious, successful, non-league team to do it with.... Would definitely have been better than effectively buying someone else's franchise though.... Mind you, a mate of mine is a season ticket holder there & there are several "original" wimbledon fans who sit near him & travel up from London each week.... I'm sure they prefer playing in a fantastic stadium in mk than going bust, which is the way they were heading at the time of the move!

Almunia is a clown
Posts: 972
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Gooner Valley N719 EIE

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by Almunia is a clown »

MK Gould wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....

.
United moved across from one side of Manchester to the other a few years before we did, City done the
same in '23 & again a few seasons back so why not call them "franchise" clubs as well as Chelsea who in 1905 were voted into the Football League BEFORE they played a game after Fulham declined a move to Stamford Bridge which is by Fulham Broadway!!!!

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by MK Gould »

Almunia is a clown wrote:
MK Gould wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:In 10 years time when Arsenal are playing their home games in Denver or Hong Kong, we'll know how they feel
Er, hello..... We were the original franchise club. Imagine how those gooners in woolwich felt when we upped sticks & moved to islington - for much the same reasons as Pete winkleman wanted wimbledon in mk....

.
United moved across from one side of Manchester to the other a few years before we did, City done the
same in '23 & again a few seasons back so why not call them "franchise" clubs as well as Chelsea who in 1905 were voted into the Football League BEFORE they played a game after Fulham declined a move to Stamford Bridge which is by Fulham Broadway!!!!
Fair point. Guess it depends how easy it would have been for the fans to follow. Maine road to city of Manchester stadium in today's world was ok. But my guess is that woolwich to highbury for a working man in the early 1900's would have been no easy journey.

Almunia is a clown
Posts: 972
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Gooner Valley N719 EIE

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by Almunia is a clown »

Plenty of Sarf London Gooners still making the journey today so can't have been that hard :barscarf:

Trip into central London & a tube to Gillespie Road Underground. Same type of journey for United Fans from north west to south east through the centre of the city

Both clubs moved just far enough to keep their original core support, & then gain across their relative cities an increase in their gates & catchment areas. :mrgreen:

Bit of a difference between "Franchise FC" & City, United, & Arsenal.

Chavski FC are a different case & much closer to the idea of a Franchise, voted into the league without
having been in the Southern or any other league beforehand :banghead: :banghead:

User avatar
bunch
Posts: 564
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:08 pm
Location: UK

Re: MK Dons v AFC Wimbledon

Post by bunch »

I love this

Maybe it should be on the BSM thread(s)

Post Reply