THE WENGER THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by northbank123 »

kiwomya wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:
Wengerball wrote:The substitution that sums it all up today

Carl Jenkinson- working hard for the team and putting in some cracking crosses- substituted off so that we end up playing Ramsey at RB.

No words really need to be said
Persisting with Le Sandwedgefoot up front when he has the scorer of 50 odd international goals on the bench comes a close second
Don't see that would have made any difference what so ever. We don't create anything. Problems are further back than Giroud.
But we were creating stuff when we had a world class centre-forward last year but no Cazorla and no Wilshere. Giroud's movement in the box is awful, he inevitably hides behind defenders and combined with the lack of runners into the box we have nobody to aim for. We actually had so much ball in dangerous positions out wide that could well had yielded two goals for a team that fills that box and has a striker with movement.

And so many times Giroud's movement was all around terrible today - their line was too high at times in the first half but instead of looking to get in behind or at least dragging a defender away he'd be standing in a completely unhelpful position.

And what about when Giroud was put through in the first half, actually brought the ball down well then was so fucking scared of pulling the trigger that he waited ages for somebody to get back and block the shot? A more clinical striker like Podolski would have got an effort away before a defender even had time to slide in.

He really is awful - bring back 'Five n Drive' Nicky B.

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by SteveO 35 »

northbank123 wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:
Wengerball wrote:The substitution that sums it all up today

Carl Jenkinson- working hard for the team and putting in some cracking crosses- substituted off so that we end up playing Ramsey at RB.

No words really need to be said
Persisting with Le Sandwedgefoot up front when he has the scorer of 50 odd international goals on the bench comes a close second
Don't see that would have made any difference what so ever. We don't create anything. Problems are further back than Giroud.
But we were creating stuff when we had a world class centre-forward last year but no Cazorla and no Wilshere. Giroud's movement in the box is awful, he inevitably hides behind defenders and combined with the lack of runners into the box we have nobody to aim for. We actually had so much ball in dangerous positions out wide that could well had yielded two goals for a team that fills that box and has a striker with movement.

And so many times Giroud's movement was all around terrible today - their line was too high at times in the first half but instead of looking to get in behind or at least dragging a defender away he'd be standing in a completely unhelpful position.

And what about when Giroud was put through in the first half, actually brought the ball down well then was so fucking scared of pulling the trigger that he waited ages for somebody to get back and block the shot? A more clinical striker like Podolski would have got an effort away before a defender even had time to slide in.

He really is awful - bring back 'Five n Drive' Nicky B.
100% agree. The French hide n' seek champion 2013

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by 1989 »

kiwomya wrote:
Wengerball wrote:The substitution that sums it all up today

Carl Jenkinson- working hard for the team and putting in some cracking crosses- substituted off so that we end up playing Ramsey at RB.

No words really need to be said
I would suggest Jenkinson's fitness isn't up to scratch yet.
No evidence whatsoever to suggest that was the case.

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by SteveO 35 »

Time for another Lord A-hole statistic me feels.

Lets have a look at this season's record against the top four in the table

Played 7
Won 1 (were actually losing when it was 11 v 11 but hey ho)
Drew 1
Lost 5
Scored 10 (5 when it was 11 v 11 but hey ho)
Conceded 13

That's what you need from the Coach of the Decade.......a real man for the big occasion

falkirk goon
Posts: 4857
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
Location: In a darkened room

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by falkirk goon »

All the Akb's harp on about the trophies this clown has won,greatest manager ever :blah: :blah: :blah: Post 2006 Arsole Wenger is our worst ever manager,his legacy is beyond gone in my book.The *word censored* has done more damage in these last 7or8 years than all the good he did before it.

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by SteveO 35 »

falkirk goon wrote:All the Akb's harp on about the trophies this clown has won,greatest manager ever :blah: :blah: :blah: Post 2006 Arsole Wenger is our worst ever manager,his legacy is beyond gone in my book.The *word censored* has done more damage in these last 7or8 years than all the good he did before it.
As I said in 1982 or 1984 he'd have got the boot because the CL didn't exist to reward pathetic failure. 16 points behind the best Liverpool side in history or 24 points behind the current Manchester United.

falkirk goon
Posts: 4857
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
Location: In a darkened room

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by falkirk goon »

SteveO 35 wrote:
falkirk goon wrote:All the Akb's harp on about the trophies this clown has won,greatest manager ever :blah: :blah: :blah: Post 2006 Arsole Wenger is our worst ever manager,his legacy is beyond gone in my book.The *word censored* has done more damage in these last 7or8 years than all the good he did before it.
As I said in 1982 or 1984 he'd have got the boot because the CL didn't exist to reward pathetic failure. 16 points behind the best Liverpool side in history or 24 points behind the current Manchester United.
So true mate and that liverpool team would wipe the fucking floor with the manure side of today.

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by SteveO 35 »

falkirk goon wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:
falkirk goon wrote:All the Akb's harp on about the trophies this clown has won,greatest manager ever :blah: :blah: :blah: Post 2006 Arsole Wenger is our worst ever manager,his legacy is beyond gone in my book.The *word censored* has done more damage in these last 7or8 years than all the good he did before it.
As I said in 1982 or 1984 he'd have got the boot because the CL didn't exist to reward pathetic failure. 16 points behind the best Liverpool side in history or 24 points behind the current Manchester United.
So true mate and that liverpool team would wipe the fucking floor with the manure side of today.
Don Howe was 3rd in the league when the club went behind his back and tried to replace him. Terry Neill had us 16 points off Liverpool and in 3 consecutive FA Cup finals for the first time in history

What has Lord Wankface done to even come close to that these past few years

kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by kiwomya »

1989 wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
Wengerball wrote:The substitution that sums it all up today

Carl Jenkinson- working hard for the team and putting in some cracking crosses- substituted off so that we end up playing Ramsey at RB.

No words really need to be said
I would suggest Jenkinson's fitness isn't up to scratch yet.
No evidence whatsoever to suggest that was the case.
I think he's played about 5 games since October for a start.

falkirk goon
Posts: 4857
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
Location: In a darkened room

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by falkirk goon »

All he does in the cups nowadays is treat them with contempt :banghead: :censored:

defleppardisking
Posts: 1044
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:30 pm

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by defleppardisking »

If he has been at chelsea, man u or man city, he would have been sacked long time ago

markyp
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:54 pm
Location: location location

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by markyp »

defleppardisking wrote:If he has been at chelsea, man u or man city, he would have been sacked long time ago
had he been at Travis fucking perkins he'd have been sacked a long time ago :(

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by northbank123 »

kiwomya wrote:
1989 wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
Wengerball wrote:The substitution that sums it all up today

Carl Jenkinson- working hard for the team and putting in some cracking crosses- substituted off so that we end up playing Ramsey at RB.

No words really need to be said
I would suggest Jenkinson's fitness isn't up to scratch yet.
No evidence whatsoever to suggest that was the case.
I think he's played about 5 games since October for a start.
Played an hour against Sunderland and only went off due to red card. Played 75 minutes against Villa and only went off because we were chasing a goal. Plus since he was dropped for Sagna's return the only other two league games he's played he lasted 90 minutes. No need for him to go off before the hour mark today on fitness grounds, just one of Wenger's pre-meditated substitutions.

I'm not Ramsey's biggest fan but there were people out there doing a worse job than him today, likewise with Jenkinson - to change both of them was crazy.

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by SteveO 35 »

defleppardisking wrote:If he has been at chelsea, man u or man city, he would have been sacked long time ago
Or Real Madrid or any top club. All the bollocks that was made out of his loyalty to the club when the reality is that he knows no other leading club in world football would allow him 8 years without a trophy.

When we miss out on the CL what little stat will he fall back on this time? The stuff about never finishing below Spurs, never losing to a team from a lower division, 13 odd consecutive years of CL Group stage qualification etc etc.....all gone up in smoke

I know.....in 16 years we have never lost by 10 goals in a game which shows 'remarkable consistency and resilience'

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by northbank123 »

SteveO 35 wrote:
defleppardisking wrote:If he has been at chelsea, man u or man city, he would have been sacked long time ago
Or Real Madrid or any top club. All the bollocks that was made out of his loyalty to the club when the reality is that he knows no other leading club in world football would allow him 8 years without a trophy.

When we miss out on the CL what little stat will he fall back on this time? The stuff about never finishing below Spurs, never losing to a team from a lower division, 13 odd consecutive years of CL Group stage qualification etc etc.....all gone up in smoke

I know.....in 16 years we have never lost by 10 goals in a game which shows 'remarkable consistency and resilience'
We'll be hearing "first finish below Spurs in x years, first season without CL in z years, Chelsea's squad cost £y million and they only finished 6 points ahead of us" :blah: :blah: :blah:

Post Reply