Lee1 wrote:Simples :
1.Want Higuain - pay the money
2.Want Fellani - pay the money
3.Want Cesar - pay the money
4.Want Bender - pay the money
Quite a straight forward situation really.....fucking Arsenal!
![]()
Says it all right there.

Lee1 wrote:Simples :
1.Want Higuain - pay the money
2.Want Fellani - pay the money
3.Want Cesar - pay the money
4.Want Bender - pay the money
Quite a straight forward situation really.....fucking Arsenal!
![]()
He's in debt isn't he? Lost money on his bling adventure. This pisses me off though. It's like FM when you recieve an amazing offer for a player, you do a dance, and then the contract breaksdown. Tragic. Why bid for the player if you cant afford his flipping wages?GranadaJoe wrote:Spanish media reporting Bendtner is in Malaga and that they are happy to pay 3 mil plus for him, but they can't afford his wages. Hopefully, the prospect of sun, cheap beer and 18-30 reps will attract him.
Not really that straightforward if the player doesn't actually want to join Arsenal or in some cases come to England.littlefire wrote:Lee1 wrote:Simples :
1.Want Higuain - pay the money
2.Want Fellani - pay the money
3.Want Cesar - pay the money
4.Want Bender - pay the money
Quite a straight forward situation really.....fucking Arsenal!
![]()
Says it all right there.
What clubs are you talking about? I've not seen anyone do this brilliant "business early" trick and sign anyone decent. City have splashed over 50M on a player with 1 cap for Brazil in the last 18 months and a bloke who starts chucking up if he get's more than a mile away from his house.franksav63 wrote:155 pages and just one crock signed. Here's a thought Arsenal, how about try and do what other clubs do and do the transfer business EARLY? I'm sure they do this on purpose just to save on wages on the incoming player(s), why not get them in early so they can bed in BEFORE the actual fucking season starts!!!
The point is that it is widely recognised that we need strengthening more than most if we really are going to compete and that we missed a one-off window of opportunity where the top 3 teams in the country were replacing their manager, although amazingly City and Chelsea both still managed to make top class signings during this period (I see you forgot Chelsea signing Van Ginkel and Schurrle). United are about to announce Alcantara joining and the Spuds got their main target, not to mention Liverpool signing one of the best keepers around and other decent players tookiwomya wrote:What clubs are you talking about? I've not seen anyone do this brilliant "business early" trick and sign anyone decent. City have splashed over 50M on a player with 1 cap for Brazil in the last 18 months and a bloke who starts chucking up if he get's more than a mile away from his house.franksav63 wrote:155 pages and just one crock signed. Here's a thought Arsenal, how about try and do what other clubs do and do the transfer business EARLY? I'm sure they do this on purpose just to save on wages on the incoming player(s), why not get them in early so they can bed in BEFORE the actual fucking season starts!!!
If you'd rather we'd signed just a load of players for the sake of "getting them early" then I understand your frustration. Otherwise, i'd rather wait in the hope that the time has been taken on signing quality.
Exactly!!SteveO 35 wrote:The point is that it is widely recognised that we need strengthening more than most if we really are going to compete and that we missed a one-off window of opportunity where the top 3 teams in the country were replacing their manager....kiwomya wrote:What clubs are you talking about? I've not seen anyone do this brilliant "business early" trick and sign anyone decent. City have splashed over 50M on a player with 1 cap for Brazil in the last 18 months and a bloke who starts chucking up if he get's more than a mile away from his house.franksav63 wrote:155 pages and just one crock signed. Here's a thought Arsenal, how about try and do what other clubs do and do the transfer business EARLY? I'm sure they do this on purpose just to save on wages on the incoming player(s), why not get them in early so they can bed in BEFORE the actual fucking season starts!!!
If you'd rather we'd signed just a load of players for the sake of "getting them early" then I understand your frustration. Otherwise, i'd rather wait in the hope that the time has been taken on signing quality.
That's all your opinion - I don't see top class amongst those players. The price of the transfer doesn't mean they are good enough. All I see a healthy batch of expensive squad players. Are any of those better than players Chelsea and City already have? How comes either of these teams didn't wrap up a deal for Falcao before Monaco?SteveO 35 wrote:The point is that it is widely recognised that we need strengthening more than most if we really are going to compete and that we missed a one-off window of opportunity where the top 3 teams in the country were replacing their manager, although amazingly City and Chelsea both still managed to make top class signings during this period (I see you forgot Chelsea signing Van Ginkel and Schurrle). United are about to announce Alcantara joining and the Spuds got their main target, not to mention Liverpool signing one of the best keepers around and other decent players tookiwomya wrote:What clubs are you talking about? I've not seen anyone do this brilliant "business early" trick and sign anyone decent. City have splashed over 50M on a player with 1 cap for Brazil in the last 18 months and a bloke who starts chucking up if he get's more than a mile away from his house.franksav63 wrote:155 pages and just one crock signed. Here's a thought Arsenal, how about try and do what other clubs do and do the transfer business EARLY? I'm sure they do this on purpose just to save on wages on the incoming player(s), why not get them in early so they can bed in BEFORE the actual fucking season starts!!!
If you'd rather we'd signed just a load of players for the sake of "getting them early" then I understand your frustration. Otherwise, i'd rather wait in the hope that the time has been taken on signing quality.
Isn't it funny how our business takes months though???
I said it right from the start with Gazidis - he doesn't have a single contact worthy of the name in world football. He's an overpaid administrator and Law his useless sidekick. Whether you liked Dein or not he had access to every chairman and owner around the world and got deals done.
Higuain isn't joining
Of course it's my opinion, err......just like your post is your opinion. That tends to be how it works when you post something (unless you're odd enough to be posting someone else's opinion ???!!!)kiwomya wrote:That's all your opinion - I don't see top class amongst those players. The price of the transfer doesn't mean they are good enough. All I see a healthy batch of expensive squad players. Are any of those better than players Chelsea and City already have? How comes either of these teams didn't wrap up a deal for Falcao before Monaco?SteveO 35 wrote:The point is that it is widely recognised that we need strengthening more than most if we really are going to compete and that we missed a one-off window of opportunity where the top 3 teams in the country were replacing their manager, although amazingly City and Chelsea both still managed to make top class signings during this period (I see you forgot Chelsea signing Van Ginkel and Schurrle). United are about to announce Alcantara joining and the Spuds got their main target, not to mention Liverpool signing one of the best keepers around and other decent players tookiwomya wrote:What clubs are you talking about? I've not seen anyone do this brilliant "business early" trick and sign anyone decent. City have splashed over 50M on a player with 1 cap for Brazil in the last 18 months and a bloke who starts chucking up if he get's more than a mile away from his house.franksav63 wrote:155 pages and just one crock signed. Here's a thought Arsenal, how about try and do what other clubs do and do the transfer business EARLY? I'm sure they do this on purpose just to save on wages on the incoming player(s), why not get them in early so they can bed in BEFORE the actual fucking season starts!!!
If you'd rather we'd signed just a load of players for the sake of "getting them early" then I understand your frustration. Otherwise, i'd rather wait in the hope that the time has been taken on signing quality.
Isn't it funny how our business takes months though???
I said it right from the start with Gazidis - he doesn't have a single contact worthy of the name in world football. He's an overpaid administrator and Law his useless sidekick. Whether you liked Dein or not he had access to every chairman and owner around the world and got deals done.
Higuain isn't joining
What are you going to do if Higuain signs for Arsenal? you seem scared that we might sign someone good! It comes across as wishful thinking to be honest.
manninger wrote:http://www.insidefutbol.com/2013/07/07/ ... ist/91410/
To Atletico Madrid? Should we ship him off?
Us? Fanny about? Real fans have real patience !Henry Norris 1913 wrote:mourinho did not like Gonzalo when he was at madrid and preferred benzema, moyes is busy keeping a leash on rooney and tevez has already signed for juve. he will be ours if we stop fannying about