The Summer 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
-
- Posts: 18462
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
We are 33/1 with skybet to sign drogba
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
With odds that long I'll sleep easy tonight. Hate thatmcdowell42 wrote:We are 33/1 with skybet to sign drogba

- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62249
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Hmmm... any suggestions, sid?topgoon wrote:As much as I don't want to see Cesc sign for someone else in the prem league, we would have to sell someone to get him
So who shall that be
Ozil
Cazorla
Rambo
Jack



-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:43 am
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Why would we have to sell? All of those four players were out for quite a long time last season via injury. Jack still hasn't really found his ideal position in the squad. Surely we'd prefer to have a squad full of high quality? I'd sleep easy knowing we had a the midfield options of those four plus Cesc, especially when the inevitable injuries build up!topgoon wrote:As much as I don't want to see Cesc sign for someone else in the prem league, we would have to sell someone to get him
So who shall that be
Ozil
Cazorla
Rambo
Jack
-
- Posts: 6663
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
- Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Finances. Let's assume for a second that this £100m warchest is accurate (I would be very surprised if we spent 100m net) would you really want to spend a third of that buying another No. 10? We already have 4 of those for that 1 position as it is. I think Cesc could possibly 'do a job' in the centre replacing Arteta but would you really want us to spend 30m getting him to do that? Personally I'd rather we chucked 30m getting the 23-25 yr old top quality athletic defensive midfielder that we've lacked since the great exodus of 2007.Jonny_Gooner wrote:Why would we have to sell? All of those four players were out for quite a long time last season via injury. Jack still hasn't really found his ideal position in the squad. Surely we'd prefer to have a squad full of high quality? I'd sleep easy knowing we had a the midfield options of those four plus Cesc, especially when the inevitable injuries build up!topgoon wrote:As much as I don't want to see Cesc sign for someone else in the prem league, we would have to sell someone to get him
So who shall that be
Ozil
Cazorla
Rambo
Jack
Factor in the current going rate for top strikers and our need for at least 2 defenders and a goalkeeper that 100m warchest (if by some miracle it even exists) is not going to go very far if we spunk 30m on Cesc without selling one of our 1908384757 other attacking midfielders.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:43 am
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
I totally understand what you're getting at, it makes sense. But realistically we aren't going to spend upwards of £30 million on a striker anyway, who would we go for anyway that would cost that much? You mention a defensive midfielder, which yeah would be good, but as I've said that won't do much if the manager doesn't allow the player to play defensive, or set the team up to play defensively.Finances. Let's assume for a second that this £100m warchest is accurate (I would be very surprised if we spent 100m net) would you really want to spend a third of that buying another No. 10? We already have 4 of those for that 1 position as it is. I think Cesc could possibly 'do a job' in the centre replacing Arteta but would you really want us to spend 30m getting him to do that? Personally I'd rather we chucked 30m getting the 23-25 yr old top quality athletic defensive midfielder that we've lacked since the great exodus of 2007.
Factor in the current going rate for top strikers and our need for at least 2 defenders and a goalkeeper that 100m warchest (if by some miracle it even exists) is not going to go very far if we spunk 30m on Cesc without selling one of our 1908384757 other attacking midfielders.
If Vermaelen goes, which isn't guaranteed yet, then we need a right back which won't be too expensive and a back up keeper which again won't be that expensive. I personally feel that £100 million (if it's true and if we'd spend it) is more than enought to justify spending £30 million on Cesc. We'd just be idiotic to let him go somewhere else.
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
We might as well be 330/1. He went to China on huge wages, matched by the Turks.......he'd want £200k per week+ and at his age what would be the point?mcdowell42 wrote:We are 33/1 with skybet to sign drogba
-
- Posts: 6663
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
- Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Arteta seems to be allowed to play defensively. I get the point with old Alex Mong, it baffled me at the time why he wasn't being forced to show even the slightest bit of discipline rather than constantly bombing on and playing Stevie Me hollywood balls.Jonny_Gooner wrote:I totally understand what you're getting at, it makes sense. But realistically we aren't going to spend upwards of £30 million on a striker anyway, who would we go for anyway that would cost that much? You mention a defensive midfielder, which yeah would be good, but as I've said that won't do much if the manager doesn't allow the player to play defensive, or set the team up to play defensively.Finances. Let's assume for a second that this £100m warchest is accurate (I would be very surprised if we spent 100m net) would you really want to spend a third of that buying another No. 10? We already have 4 of those for that 1 position as it is. I think Cesc could possibly 'do a job' in the centre replacing Arteta but would you really want us to spend 30m getting him to do that? Personally I'd rather we chucked 30m getting the 23-25 yr old top quality athletic defensive midfielder that we've lacked since the great exodus of 2007.
Factor in the current going rate for top strikers and our need for at least 2 defenders and a goalkeeper that 100m warchest (if by some miracle it even exists) is not going to go very far if we spunk 30m on Cesc without selling one of our 1908384757 other attacking midfielders.
If Vermaelen goes, which isn't guaranteed yet, then we need a right back which won't be too expensive and a back up keeper which again won't be that expensive. I personally feel that £100 million (if it's true and if we'd spend it) is more than enought to justify spending £30 million on Cesc. We'd just be idiotic to let him go somewhere else.
We need 4 center backs. Clearly a large part of Wenger's thinking last season was that Sagna could cover as a 4th CB (which he did very well when needed). Even with Vermaelen staying we need a CB unless he gets another utility man at RB, which I hope he doesn't because there are very few around who can play both positions as well as Sagna.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:43 am
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
I guess he has been allowed to do that, either that or both Arteta and Wenger know that he's very limited now at providing much going forward, particularly with the talent we have in that area. But yeah my thinking is largely how our last 'defensive' midfielder, Song, was allowed to bomb forward as you mention.Arteta seems to be allowed to play defensively. I get the point with old Alex Mong, it baffled me at the time why he wasn't being forced to show even the slightest bit of discipline rather than constantly bombing on and playing Stevie Me hollywood balls.
We need 4 center backs. Clearly a large part of Wenger's thinking last season was that Sagna could cover as a 4th CB (which he did very well when needed). Even with Vermaelen staying we need a CB unless he gets another utility man at RB, which I hope he doesn't because there are very few around who can play both positions as well as Sagna.
I agree with you about 4 center backs, but if Vermaelen stays then I don't see why we have to particularly spend a massive amount on a 4th choice centre back. Do we not have any of these vaunted 'internal solutions' for that area anyway?

Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Hangeland released at Fulham....an option as a backup?
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:43 am
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Hmm, could be a possibility. Although at 32 he's clearly pushing on, even as a back up. I think I'd prefer a younger player that can learn from Per and Kos. But he's free so Wenger will probably snap him up!manninger wrote:Hangeland released at Fulham....an option as a backup?
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Finally sanityLDB wrote:Finances. Let's assume for a second that this £100m warchest is accurate (I would be very surprised if we spent 100m net) would you really want to spend a third of that buying another No. 10? We already have 4 of those for that 1 position as it is. I think Cesc could possibly 'do a job' in the centre replacing Arteta but would you really want us to spend 30m getting him to do that? Personally I'd rather we chucked 30m getting the 23-25 yr old top quality athletic defensive midfielder that we've lacked since the great exodus of 2007.Jonny_Gooner wrote:Why would we have to sell? All of those four players were out for quite a long time last season via injury. Jack still hasn't really found his ideal position in the squad. Surely we'd prefer to have a squad full of high quality? I'd sleep easy knowing we had a the midfield options of those four plus Cesc, especially when the inevitable injuries build up!topgoon wrote:As much as I don't want to see Cesc sign for someone else in the prem league, we would have to sell someone to get him
So who shall that be
Ozil
Cazorla
Rambo
Jack
Factor in the current going rate for top strikers and our need for at least 2 defenders and a goalkeeper that 100m warchest (if by some miracle it even exists) is not going to go very far if we spunk 30m on Cesc without selling one of our 1908384757 other attacking midfielders.
- GranadaJoe
- Posts: 2412
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
Yeah, but he'll still be faster than Giroud-remigardeshair wrote:He's also currently out with a long term cruciate injury so perfect for us.GranadaJoe wrote: If we're going to raid Madrid for one of their forwards we should go for Jesé. He's quick, two-footed, scores and makes goals and can play in any of the attacking positions.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:43 am
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
End of the day I'd rather we add a world class midfielder in Cesc to the squad than have any of our 'rivals' being strengthened. We can never have too many world class players, or is our current abundance of those types of players weighing us down? Yes it shouldn't be at the detriment of strengthening other areas of the squad (particularly up front), but how exactly could we say signing Cesc is a bad thing?
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892/tra ... /4858821/-
Plus one of those players who are currently clogging up the midfield want's him back...
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892/tra ... /4858821/-
Plus one of those players who are currently clogging up the midfield want's him back...
- the playing mantis
- Posts: 4849
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
- Location: EX
Re: SUMMER 2014 TRANSFER THREAD
we wont sign cesc. hes not a priority position. but we should sign him if we can depose of cazorla. cesc is twice the player he is.