


Time to spread the love once more...


"Its more a question of concentration than quality"Gunner Rob wrote:Jacqui Oatley take a bowMidz wrote:She was asking reasonable questions in order to obtain realistic answers.
Buy her a pint![]()
just watched it again. So she asked him why he hadn't strengthened the defence over the summer. He replied "you watched the game today. I can't understand why you would ask such a question"Truly embarrassing. He is a demented old fool. He had his chance to leave, he chose the money instead and for that he must now be driven out of the club.
Saw one comment on social media calling her a bitch.. Really thought Wenker was going to hit her with the "30 years" quote.Kvltman wrote:If you go on Jacqui Oatley's Twitter page there is a lot about the Wenger interview, including some giving her abuse for asking such direct questions.
It's great that at last he was put more on the spot than ever before and I get that it was just after the game and tensions were high but he still reacted very poorly.
He absolutely does, unbelievably flippant. You wait until he gets questions about fans booing or negative chants and he will really let everyone know how little he thinks of the fans. That interview at Villa Park back in 2012/13 was a disgrace. Over the last 3 seasons he has just about done enough to arrest our slides before they really got stuck into him.Dan_85 wrote:He really turns into a snarky, arrogant tosser when an interviewer actually puts a little bit of pressure on him doesn't he.rodders999 wrote:Female reporter from the beeb made the fucker squirm here, fair play to her. HOUND HIM OUT.
http://youtu.be/28IBdLJA3Ag
"You have been at the game, why do you ask a question like this about defenders?"Errmm, because we have a second choice LB playing in central defence because you neglected to build a proper squad?
Brady's left peg wrote:One Jacqui Oatley........ there's only one Jacqui Oatley![]()
![]()
![]()
Absolutely agree with the sentiment about the FA Cup win being a springboard. Of course Wenger leaving would have been an integral part of that process but I still can't believe how badly we are playing.essexgooner123 wrote:For me the title is gone already. On our current form, and Chelsea, as well as Manchester City, playing as they are, their is no way we will be able to catch them. In fact we may fall even further off the pace before too long. What really disappoints me is that within the club there was clearly not enough of a move to use the cup win as a starting point for a great new era of success. Once again we did not have enough of a clear plan for the transfer window, and are already paying the price.
No and she has "managed zero games".SteveO 35 wrote:Brady's left peg wrote:One Jacqui Oatley........ there's only one Jacqui Oatley![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Has she worked in football for 30 years ?
He really doesn't like it when people are truthful with him does he...Just like the majority of our over pampered, delicate players - a bit of reality might wake the fuckers up from the dreamland they live in....I am fed up with all the journo's and ex-players who still treat him and them with Kid Gloves - FFS it takes a woman to man up and get in his face.Gunner Rob wrote:Jacqui Oatley take a bowMidz wrote:She was asking reasonable questions in order to obtain realistic answers.
Buy her a pint![]()
just watched it again. So she asked him why he hadn't strengthened the defence over the summer. He replied "you watched the game today. I can't understand why you would ask such a question"Truly embarrassing. He is a demented old fool. He had his chance to leave, he chose the money instead and for that he must now be driven out of the club.
She is though a fully qualified football coach.Offside wrote:No and she has "managed zero games".SteveO 35 wrote:Brady's left peg wrote:One Jacqui Oatley........ there's only one Jacqui Oatley![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Has she worked in football for 30 years ?
Brady's left peg wrote:One Jacqui Oatley........ there's only one Jacqui Oatley![]()
![]()
![]()