Mackems (A) match thread.

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ed Hunter The Gooner
Posts: 870
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:27 am
Location: The Football Wonderland of Finland

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Ed Hunter The Gooner »

Thank you Fat Head Brown and Don Vito... and Alexis of course to being in the right place on the right time! Other than that, piss poor and fucking boring. I actually fell asleep during the match... we were saved just because Sunderland is so shit.

Sam59
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 9:46 am

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Sam59 »

Lee1 wrote:How many times did Cazorla fly it high and wide over the bar? Shocking :oops:
2 I think.

Alexis did well. He's a class above anyone else. He has to be wondering what on earth he joined. Gibbs crocked yet again too.
Sunderland look like relegation candidates on this form.

User avatar
safcftm
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: Sunderland!

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by safcftm »

safcftm wrote:
augie wrote:The big nose scouser on sky seems to be suggesting that mannone is having a bit of a 'mare :lol:
Im in the ground, about 50 yards from vito, not watching on sky like that big nosed prick thompson (drinking in the concourse trying to avoidthe second half) and he can fuck off. Mannone has done nowt wrong. Shite v southampton but he took us to wembley and kept us up, thompson can suck my dick, fuck off and die, in any order he fancies. We're shite, we'll lose, but we're used to it. Brown fucked up, we cant create a chance, thats not mannones fault
The second one on the other hand, yeah, he was shite

Riotof91
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 3:17 pm

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Riotof91 »

Awful performance against an awful team. Not one good player out there today bar Sanchez. Welbeck movement upfront is Sunday League, not good enough. Gibbs now injured, Per hobbling. Arteta & Flamini offer nothing & are defensive liabilities. Defence is in bits with no options left. Shame we didn't have a clue that any of this would happen when the transfer window was open. Oh wait, we did...

:banghead:

User avatar
foxinthebox2001
Posts: 704
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:24 am
Location: Beyond the Wall.

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by foxinthebox2001 »

Exactly how I expected it to go down.

User avatar
Gunnersaurus
Posts: 4151
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:06 am
Location: london

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Gunnersaurus »

Every 3 points is worth celebrating with this shambles.

All hail Sanchez, pretty much dragging our season anywhere at the moment, our only hope this year is that Walcott comes back and hits the ground running meaning Sanchez and Walcott bail us out of the you know what more often than not.

The plus side to the Gibbs injury is that Monreal at CB is now over, him playing there is more embaressing than all the injuries, a balanced back 4 with players playing where they know to play might just work now that the manager can't make things difficult for them as it's no longer in his hands.

User avatar
GranadaJoe
Posts: 2412
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by GranadaJoe »

Very mediocre. Alexis' work ethic earned him the second goal. Other than that nobody shone.

Dannyboy is looking a yard short of pace. I suspect the pressure of playing every game and being the lone striker is starting to tell.

While it's a terrible endictment of AW that it has to happen, I think Nacho has tried hard in a position for which he is obviously unsuited.

clockender1
Posts: 6257
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by clockender1 »

meh.

User avatar
donaldo71
Posts: 369
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:23 pm

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by donaldo71 »

We are so fucking predictable pedestrian and boring.Every performance is the same.Without two gift wrapped goals from Brown and Mannone this game would have finished 0-0.We created fuck all against a shell shocked Sunderland defence. Chamberlain needs to take a good look at himself.How many times is he given a chance and he fucks it up.

User avatar
Gunnersaurus
Posts: 4151
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:06 am
Location: london

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Gunnersaurus »

They were never going to roll over last week, that's not making excuses for us just pointing out that they couldn't have been that bad again.

User avatar
Midz
Posts: 5803
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: West London.

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Midz »

markyp wrote:absolute fucking tripe,so fucking pedestrian,no urgency at all,up front clueless and trying to walk the ball in,we have two bullets in sanchez and welbeck,smash it over the top for them to chase,oh my god these performances are consistently the worst of Wenkers reign,WENKER OUT :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Absolutely. What's wrong with playing the long ball now & again? It works well for Chelsea and other teams that do it against us and score, so why can't we employ the same tactic? I'd like to see it hit over the top for Welbeck or Alexis to chase.
I'd also like to see more crosses put in like the one Chambers did for Gibbs goal, that was pure class.

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30983
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by augie »

Have only seen motd highlights but the standout issue for me is how deep wellbeck seemed to be dropping - is he already being educated about the need to get involved in the intricate link up play outside their area ? Can we not just have a striker that plays like a striker instead of fcuking around at the halfway line playing sidewards passes like the rest of these c.unts ?? :banghead:

User avatar
Ray C
Posts: 1100
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:51 am
Location: Northbank - Tas

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Ray C »

Lee1 wrote:How many times did Cazorla fly it high and wide over the bar? Shocking :oops:
He can't finish. If he had we could have won by 5. He seems to try to hit the ball too hard instead of using the speed of the pass & just place it. At least work the keeper. We deserved the win as we created more than them unlike the midweek CL game. :barscarf: :barscarf:

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by QuartzGooner »

augie wrote:Have only seen motd highlights but the standout issue for me is how deep wellbeck seemed to be dropping
Versus Hull it was a different story, his movement was excellent; he was both deep and up front, making space, popping into space.

User avatar
Gunnersaurus
Posts: 4151
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:06 am
Location: london

Re: Mackems (A) match thread.

Post by Gunnersaurus »

Watched the whole game and Welbeck looked tired, thought he week really showed.

Post Reply