Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by franksav63 »

beck wrote:
franksav63 wrote:
beck wrote:
franksav63 wrote:
highburyJD wrote:don't think your standards are realistic Frank:
you think Cesc is a failure/loser, IMO he's one of the world's best midfielders.
Ca$hley was for the best part of a decade the World's top player in his position
So that's 2 players in what.... 16/17 seasons... :lol: :lol: 1 nicked from the Barca youth academy... yes I can see how you reckon this is a good return... :roll: :roll: ... and what did Cesc win for us precisely??? :roll: :roll:
cesc won the fa cup in 2005 with us
we have a certain jack wilshere as well
oh... yeah and big whoop!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:
gave rather a big whoop when liam brady won his 1 and only trophy with us at the 1979 fa cup final
he came out of our youth academy as well
and how many more players than just Brady came through our youth academy then? Alot more than Wenger has ever produced!

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by g88ner »

franksav63 wrote: and how many more players than just Brady came through our youth academy then? Alot more than Wenger has ever produced!
You're turning this into another anti-Wenger thread?

FFS, it's another world, Frank!

Back when Brady came through, English football was pretty much British players only, with a sprinkling of the odd foreigner... under those conditions, I'm not surprised our academy churned out more players.

The level has risen to the point we're at now, where hardly any British players developed at the top clubs are key players, so we're hardly alone. Most key players for Arsenal, chavs, Liverpool, Citeh, Sp*rs, etc. are signed.

There's many things to moan at Wenger for, but pointing your finger at him for not producing the same number of players as back in the 70s seems ridiculous to me.

User avatar
Brady's left peg
Posts: 777
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:34 pm
Location: In GG's brown envelope or the Sussex Coast.

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by Brady's left peg »

g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote: and how many more players than just Brady came through our youth academy then? Alot more than Wenger has ever produced!
You're turning this into another anti-Wenger thread?

FFS, it's another world, Frank!

Back when Brady came through, English football was pretty much British players only, with a sprinkling of the odd foreigner... under those conditions, I'm not surprised our academy churned out more players.

The level has risen to the point we're at now, where hardly any British players developed at the top clubs are key players, so we're hardly alone. Most key players for Arsenal, chavs, Liverpool, Citeh, Sp*rs, etc. are signed.

There's many things to moan at Wenger for, but pointing your finger at him for not producing the same number of players as back in the 70s seems ridiculous to me.
I have to agree here g88ner...... and I am as anti Wenger as they come. But your right the face of footie has changed immeasurably since the 70's, and however much I would like to lay the blame at Wenger's door I think he escapes this one. :D

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by franksav63 »

g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote: and how many more players than just Brady came through our youth academy then? Alot more than Wenger has ever produced!
You're turning this into another anti-Wenger thread?

FFS, it's another world, Frank!

Back when Brady came through, English football was pretty much British players only, with a sprinkling of the odd foreigner... under those conditions, I'm not surprised our academy churned out more players.

The level has risen to the point we're at now, where hardly any British players developed at the top clubs are key players, so we're hardly alone. Most key players for Arsenal, chavs, Liverpool, Citeh, Sp*rs, etc. are signed.

There's many things to moan at Wenger for, but pointing your finger at him for not producing the same number of players as back in the 70s seems ridiculous to me.

How the fuck am I? It started turning (look at page 7) long before I got into the argument, so look back and see for yourself before you start pontificating and it was Beck who brought up Brady first... FFS!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by g88ner »

franksav63 wrote:
g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote: and how many more players than just Brady came through our youth academy then? Alot more than Wenger has ever produced!
You're turning this into another anti-Wenger thread?

FFS, it's another world, Frank!

Back when Brady came through, English football was pretty much British players only, with a sprinkling of the odd foreigner... under those conditions, I'm not surprised our academy churned out more players.

The level has risen to the point we're at now, where hardly any British players developed at the top clubs are key players, so we're hardly alone. Most key players for Arsenal, chavs, Liverpool, Citeh, Sp*rs, etc. are signed.

There's many things to moan at Wenger for, but pointing your finger at him for not producing the same number of players as back in the 70s seems ridiculous to me.

How the fuck am I? It started turning (look at page 7) long before I got into the argument, so look back and see for yourself before you start pontificating and it was Beck who brought up Brady first... FFS!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Sorry Frank if I misunderstood your post mate, but I've re-read your comment and can't see what else you could have meant? - whether you started it or not is neither here nor there, if I've misunderstood what you wrote, what point were you trying to make then?

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by franksav63 »

g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote:
g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote: and how many more players than just Brady came through our youth academy then? Alot more than Wenger has ever produced!
You're turning this into another anti-Wenger thread?

FFS, it's another world, Frank!

Back when Brady came through, English football was pretty much British players only, with a sprinkling of the odd foreigner... under those conditions, I'm not surprised our academy churned out more players.

The level has risen to the point we're at now, where hardly any British players developed at the top clubs are key players, so we're hardly alone. Most key players for Arsenal, chavs, Liverpool, Citeh, Sp*rs, etc. are signed.

There's many things to moan at Wenger for, but pointing your finger at him for not producing the same number of players as back in the 70s seems ridiculous to me.

How the fuck am I? It started turning (look at page 7) long before I got into the argument, so look back and see for yourself before you start pontificating and it was Beck who brought up Brady first... FFS!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Sorry Frank if I misunderstood your post mate, but I've re-read your comment and can't see what else you could have meant? - whether you started it or not is neither here nor there, if I've misunderstood what you wrote, what point were you trying to make then?
Beck mentioned Brady first, I was replying to him, he was somehow trying to defend, IMO, Wenger's very poor youth record by mentioning Brady coming through some 30 years beforehand, I was merely pointing out that even then we brought more players through back then, I know it's a different era, but if he hadn't mentioned Brady I wouldn't have even referenced it!

beck
Posts: 595
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:19 am

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by beck »

franksav63 wrote:
g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote:
g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote: and how many more players than just Brady came through our youth academy then? Alot more than Wenger has ever produced!
You're turning this into another anti-Wenger thread?

FFS, it's another world, Frank!

Back when Brady came through, English football was pretty much British players only, with a sprinkling of the odd foreigner... under those conditions, I'm not surprised our academy churned out more players.

The level has risen to the point we're at now, where hardly any British players developed at the top clubs are key players, so we're hardly alone. Most key players for Arsenal, chavs, Liverpool, Citeh, Sp*rs, etc. are signed.

There's many things to moan at Wenger for, but pointing your finger at him for not producing the same number of players as back in the 70s seems ridiculous to me.

How the fuck am I? It started turning (look at page 7) long before I got into the argument, so look back and see for yourself before you start pontificating and it was Beck who brought up Brady first... FFS!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Sorry Frank if I misunderstood your post mate, but I've re-read your comment and can't see what else you could have meant? - whether you started it or not is neither here nor there, if I've misunderstood what you wrote, what point were you trying to make then?
Beck mentioned Brady first, I was replying to him, he was somehow trying to defend, IMO, Wenger's very poor youth record by mentioning Brady coming through some 30 years beforehand, I was merely pointing out that even then we brought more players through back then, I know it's a different era, but if he hadn't mentioned Brady I wouldn't have even referenced it!
no i was,nt
i was pointing out that the fa cup was as important in 1979 as it was in 2005 and still is to football fans
and whoop de doo cesc won it with the arsenal
that means a lot more to me than having 4th as your target

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by I Hate Hleb »

Seems to me like you guys agree. So why the feck are you arguing?!! :banghead: :banghead: :roll: :lol: :lol: :wink:

User avatar
Herd
Posts: 6386
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:00 am

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by Herd »

Frimpong must have renewed his contract as he is still listed as a first team squad member or did i miss something ??

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by northbank123 »

Herd wrote:Frimpong must have renewed his contract as he is still listed as a first team squad member or did i miss something ??
Didn't expire til next year apparently

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 10010
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by TeeCee »

Thank f*** for that!! Didn't want to let diddlybingbong slip through our fingers!! :lol: :lol:

User avatar
highburyJD
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by highburyJD »

Had this argument with my bro yesterday, he thinks Frimpong is useless
I think he could turn out to be a Flamster type figure for us
can't see us buying more than one DM
if Tets and/or the new signing gets a long term injury we're a suspension away from third choice
LeCoq is off on loan, we need Frimpong as a cup player/backup

georgeknows89
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:42 am
Location: Herts

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by georgeknows89 »

Frimpong is in his last season on his old contract and will leave deffo, perhaps even soon, permanent unless the club offer new improved terms, but if he can't play then he can't prove himself so same old problem.

He was offered a new contract last season at the time the group of 5 all signed , but it was only on the same wages as previous contract. Perhaps worth more overall but with injuries etc can understand clubs caution.... for a change !

He turned it down and wanted to go on loan to prove himself , get game time and earn a better contract but ending up at fulham did him no good.

He,like a lot of the kids, although yes money driven also want to play football every week and is resigned to the fact that it is not going to happen now, partly him , partly bad luck with injuries.A season long loan in championship is his only hope and staying injury free but if he can find the right club and deal he will be off

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by northbank123 »

Don't think he can turn his nose up at getting a new deal on the same money!

He's been unfortunate with injuries but unfortunately just isn't going to be able to show he can cut it. My mate is a Wolves fan and he was raving about him before he got crocked (although to be fair he also used to rate Karl Henry so 'nuff said). Agreed that what he needs is a season-long loan at a Championship side or a struggling PL side where he'll start every week, if there are any. It's probably a year or two too late for that in terms of his Arsenal career but it's what'll serve him best personally.

User avatar
highburyJD
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Re: Coquelin/Frimpong/Yennaris and Youths, Angha/Crowley

Post by highburyJD »

if we let Frimpong go as well as leCoq we look very light at DM
who can play there: Tets, Rambo then what? Yennaris... Vermaelen?

Post Reply