WHEN THEY SAY WE WERE NORTH LONDON FIRST

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
Trevor Ross
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:15 am

Re:

Post by Trevor Ross »

Red Gunner wrote:
QuartzGooner wrote:It is all semantics.

Spurs have only won the league twice.

That is enough to show how far below us they are.
Not sure about that...

11 Reasons why Spurs are bigger than Arsenal

1. Tottenham have won a major trophy in each of the last full decades dating back to the 1950s (only Man U can equal this).

2. Tottenham were the first London club to win the FA Cup in 1901 and when were still the only London club to have won it, when we lifted it again 20 years later. Indeed it took until 1930 for Arsenal to finally capture the cup, for what was to be their first major trophy, some 44 years after they had been formed (it took us just 19 years after our formation to lift our first trophy by comparison).

3. Tottenham were the first London club to win a European trophy (indeed first British club).

4. Tottenham have won three UEFA European trophies, Arsenal just the one.

5. Tottenham were the first London side to win the double in 60’61, doing it in style, unlike the anti-football of Arsenal ten years later. At the time, we had most points, most goals, most points and most wins. We still hold most wins in top flight from this memorable season as well as most wins from start season in the top flight. By contrast Arsenal did not even score the most goals of that particular campaign when they sneaked their way to the double in 70’71.

6. Tottenham record’s transfer fee paid (as of August 27th at least) is £25.8 million, Arsenal’s just £15 million.

7. Tottenham’s record attendance 75038, Arsenal’s 73707.

8. Arsenal recorded just 4,554 supporters in a top flight match v Leeds in 1966, just four months later Tottenham recorded 43,844 in the equivalent fixture, nearly ten times as many fans, watching the same opposition in the same completion, when our grounds were of very similar size.

9. Since the war, six times Tottenham have been the best supported club in England, Arsenal just twice (Tottenham were even the best supported in the country as a second division side – once again showing that even when the chips are down Spurs supporters turn out in droves).

10. Tottenham’s lowest ever average league crowd 13,370, Arsenal’s 4,460 (indeed 14 seasons in total Arsenal have averaged worse crowds than Tottenham’s lowest).

11. Tottenham have provided 70 representatives for the national side (the second highest of all time, just one player behind Villa), Arsenal have provided just 57.


viewtopic.php?p=856432#p856432

:oops: :lol:

Just to make sure everything's in context...

7. Highbury never held 75,000 so bit difficult to reach that figure (73707 was against Lens at Wembley anyway)

8. Everybody knows that end-of-season irrelevant game was played in the pouring rain the same May night as Liverpool's Cup Winners Cup Final was being televised live. We actually averaged over 29,000 that season, not bad for a team that finished 14th. Tottenham obviously played them early the following season, with all to play for.

9. Not surprising our Middlesex historian chose only post-second world war stats, as entire-history figures tell a very different story. Whilst Tottenham have indeed been the nation's best supported club 6 times (all surrounding their 2 title wins), Arsenal have received that accolade 12 times. Tottenham did achieve the feat as a second tier club, but only in a season when they actually won the division, and when the top 3 First Division teams were Portsmouth, Wolves and Sunderland, none of whom have ever been England's best supported club. If you want a real 'support when the chips are down' story you need to look to 1925, when Arsenal were the best supported club despite finishing 20th, one place from relegation, and before we'd ever won anything of note.

10. Again our Home Counties friend has been rather economical with the truth, in that he fails to reveal that EVERY one of our 14 'lower than Tottenham's lowest' average attendance seasons were at Plumstead, before our 'move or die' relocation to Highbury. Indeed, since the playing field was levelled in 1913, the 3 lowest non-war average attendance figures have all belonged to Tottenham, 2 of which were achieved in Division one, the most recent (and lowest) being a mere 2 seasons after their last European trophy victory.

And if you know your history...

User avatar
Herd
Posts: 6386
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:00 am

Re: WHEN THEY SAY WE WERE NORTH LONDON FIRST

Post by Herd »

To be honest this fcuk off back to sarf London bullshit has been going on for only abt 10 years .
Ive been ribbing them that they wernt even a London club until 1965 for as long as I remember .

Had one on the phone yesterday saying they thought the game was pretty even for a while ............the quick retort was "Yea your right but then they kicked off " silence muffled curse and hang up !

Almunia is a clown
Posts: 972
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Gooner Valley N719 EIE

Re: Re:

Post by Almunia is a clown »

Trevor Ross wrote:

8. Everybody knows that end-of-season irrelevant game was played in the pouring rain the same May night as Liverpool's Cup Winners Cup Final was being televised live. We actually averaged over 29,000 that season, not bad for a team that finished 14th. Tottenham obviously played them early the following season, with all to play for.
Before my time but I've read a while back that the Leeds game was subject to a very successful boycott by Arsenal supporters demanding that Billy Wright was sacked from his managerial position. He was sacked soon afterwards.

Anyone remember this? :barscarf:

http://onlinegooner.com/article.php?sec ... t17Gyg4m2w

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: WHEN THEY SAY WE WERE NORTH LONDON FIRST

Post by northbank123 »

Does it actually wind up people from North London when they dredge up this boring century-old shite?

arseofacrow
Posts: 6173
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cologne

Re: WHEN THEY SAY WE WERE NORTH LONDON FIRST

Post by arseofacrow »

northbank123 wrote:Does it actually wind up people from North London when they dredge up this boring century-old shite?
No

:D

User avatar
Herd
Posts: 6386
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:00 am

Re: Re:

Post by Herd »

Before my time but I've read a while back that the Leeds game was subject to a very successful boycott by Arsenal supporters demanding that Billy Wright was sacked from his managerial position. He was sacked soon afterwards.

Anyone remember this? :barscarf:
Before my time but My dad told me that he used to go at this time as we lived in Drayton Park .

He told me Wright was a calamitous manager who was given a lot of bail because of his legendary status as longtime England captain .
He would chop and change the side at a whim and experimented with new styles and abandon them frequently .

Worse he addicted to the celeb lifestyle and was married to one of the Beverly sisters and kept involving them in the affairs of Arsenal.
He had them lead us out at the swamp one year and they were due to sing a song but got booed off to much laughter of the swamp dwellers ,my mates dad says it was the most embarrassing day of his life and he never went there again .

The backbone of the double side were there during his reign but we didn't do much it took Don Howe n Bertie Mee for that !

Post Reply